Social housing landlords should offer their residents a range of options for being involved as required by the Tenant Involvement and Empowerment Standard. They should also provide residents with information about their performance and publish annually (from April 2024) data relating to the Tenant Satisfaction Measures.
Resident involvement and empowerment
Consultation - regulatory requirements
Social housing landlords are required to ensure that residents are given a wide range of opportunities to influence and be involved in:
- the formulation of their landlord’s housing-related policies and strategic priorities
- the making of decisions about how housing-related services are delivered, including the setting of service standards
- the scrutiny of their landlord’s performance and the making of recommendations to their landlord about how performance might be improved
- the management of their homes, where applicable
- the management of repair and maintenance services, such as commissioning and undertaking a range of repair tasks, as agreed with landlords, and the sharing in savings made, and
- agreeing local offers for service delivery
Resident consultation
Consultation is any activity that gives residents a voice and an opportunity to influence important decisions. Some consultation is statutory (your landlord must do it) and some is non-statutory. There are various methods that landlords use to consult with their residents; some of these are shown in the table below.
Method | Standard Process | Alternative Process |
---|---|---|
Self-completion Surveys | Postal returns Text messaging |
Social media Website |
Telephone interviews | Telephone sample | Targeted sampling |
Face to face surveys and interviews | Door knocking exercises On the street surveying Focus groups Sounding boards |
Workshops Public meetings |
Drop in events | Consultation days Exhibitions |
Community forums Roadshows |
Online forums | Chat rooms | Discussion and focus groups |
Shaping services
Effective systems to review services might include:
- a systematic plan to review frontline services so that residents are clear when particular elements of the service will be reviewed
- leadership of the review by a team including residents, staff and possibly governing body members
- gathering evidence that feeds into the review (such as survey data, evidence of dissatisfaction, focus groups, the use of resident sounding boards, resident inspection and mystery shopping reports, performance data, benchmark information and information on best practice used elsewhere)
- collating this evidence in a resident friendly fashion to enable residents to challenge emerging conclusions and to enable informed debate between members of the review team
- changes to policies, procedures and systems that are then fed back to residents to show how their input made a difference.
For a co-operative, service changes would require a General Meeting to be held to agree the changes.
Was this article helpful?
YesNo